Good thing I'm not religious.
See what fuel efficiency gets you? See? See?
Jeez, I'd better get a Hummer ASAP.

Revisiting the visited.
A while ago I wrote that all of the gay marriage ballyhoo would eventually turn on those pounding the drums, as the more you attempt to cram something down the throat of the public, the more they tend to revolt against it.
Well boys, if you can't win New York, I wouldn't count on winning much else.
Activists had hoped to widen marriage rights for gays and lesbians beyond Massachusetts with a legal victory in liberal New York, but the Court of Appeals ruled 4-2 that the state's law allowing marriage only between a man and a woman was constitutional.
The decision comes two years after gay and lesbian couples, supported by gay-rights groups who saw a chance for a major court win in a populous state, sued for the right to wed.
"Clearly, in bringing the case and pushing it as hard as they did, it's pretty good evidence that they thought they had a substantial chance of victory," said Ohio State University law professor Marc Spindelman, who tracks lesbian and gay legal issues. "It's hard to read the decision as anything other than a rebuff of gay and lesbian couples."